Wednesday, May 11, 2022

Should recycling be mandatory essay

Should recycling be mandatory essay

should recycling be mandatory essay

Beyond the scope of the activities accomplished by the devoted environmentalists, recycling should be mandatory to every household in the civilized and eco-friendly society. Recycling lessens the need for landfills The sustainability of recycling serves as the best response to the rapidly increasing consumerism trends and subsequent amounts of waste Recycling cans and bottles can help save the earth form waste and trash build up and can make new things that why recycling should be mandatory and there should be recycling cans in various locations at school and everywhere else. Recycling should be mandatory because recycling can help to keep our planet clean in many blogger.comted Reading Time: 3 mins Recycling should be mandatory because it will save energy, reduce landfills, and protect the environment. Many people today still don’t realise what recycling really does. According to the dictionary, “Recycling converts show more content. It prolongs the earth, and may not protect in the way you might think



Should Recycling be Mandatory - Free Essay Example | blogger.com



Is recycling really going green with the environment? Or is recycling just a way to go for green material known as dollars? Recycling is a method in which materials that are not used anymore by people are processed in order to transform them in useful products. Some experts in the issue affirm that this practice is still running because recycling was transformed into a political issue that helps government and environmentalists to win money and create jobs. Many people, politicians and non-profit organizations support recycling, generally based on misconceptions; while there are other people that do not support it based on facts.


According to Christopher Douglassdramatic predictions of landfill closings created a crisis mentality in America. Order custom essay Should Recycling Be Mandatory? with free plagiarism report. The situation that the Should recycling be mandatory essay presented to the Congress in seemed to be disastrous; but fortunately those predictions were all wrong. As a result, state and local governments had the idea of implementing a method that was supposed to reduce garbage, pollution and save resources: the government implemented recycling.


Recycling seemed to be a great process that was supposed to save resources, should recycling be mandatory essay, clean the environment and also make money. Local governments had the idea of making money by selling recovered household waste. The process of recycling, as explained by the government, looked like a miraculous way in which all problems of garbage would be solved and that not enough with it, it will also make money for the government. Recycling was a great Idea; it was the hope of the government and also for the citizens of the United States. The only problem with this movement was that its foundational notions were, in large part, misconceptions.


The new landfills opening in the s were much larger in order to offset the high fixed costs of the new rules and today; landfill capacity is more than adequate Douglass, The beginning of this custom that is still practiced in our city is based in misconceptions and myths. Many non-profit organizations and even schools interested in the wellness of the community, such as Joy Christian School, supports recycling and make ads in order to persuade people to recycle for a healthier world. According to the National Recycling Coalition NRCwell-run recycling programs cost less to operate than waste collection, landfilling, and incineration. They also argue that the more people recycle, should recycling be mandatory essay, the cheaper it gets Recycling Benefits, Organizations that support recycling usually discuss that recycling is not a waste of money and that sometimes it helps to save and earn more money.


According to the NRC recycling creates 1. For every job collecting recyclables, there are 26 jobs in processing the materials and manufacturing them into new products Recycling Benefits, Even thought these facts seem to be a very good should recycling be mandatory essay for recycling, should recycling be mandatory essay, they are not. It is more expensive to collect a ton of recyclables that a ton of landfill garbage. Many local government have been in the necessity of cancelling their recycling programs because after all, those programs always end operating at a deficit. Recycling also creates many jobs, just as the NRC said, but the problem is that in many cases the local governments do not have the enough money to pay for all those new jobs created by recycling; and that is another reason why recycling programs usually operate at a deficit.


Recycling is a very expensive method. Recycling is not the solution to save natural resources; actually, in some cases it is responsible for wasting more resources. The should recycling be mandatory essay that recycling will save all natural resources of the earth is just a myth; truly, in some cases the recycling processes waste more resources than the manufacturing process. Making recyclables generates waste. According to Peter Werbeall the water bottles are supposed to be recycled; but truly, just the ones with the number 1 or 2 printed at the bottom of the bottle can be recycled.


He also states that recycling these bottles are only slightly better than letting them go into a landfill. Actually, he is being generous because if people compute the energy needed to ship a leftover designer water bottle to China along with millions of others to be reprocessed, manufactured into a new item, then shipped back to the U. Even one of the best examples that environmentalist use to persuade people to recycle has had problems with the environment. Recycling water bottles does not always helps the environment or saves recourses; actually, sometimes it produces more pollution due to the energy used to transport the bottles and process them. Recycling sometimes could be even harmful than beneficial, should recycling be mandatory essay. In addition, should recycling be mandatory essay, there is another factor to consider when people think about saving resources: the scarcity.


Yet there is no environmental reason to recycle trash because resources are not scarce. For example, another example that environmentalist usually use trying to persuade people to recycle is paper. They argue that if people ecycle paper sheets or newsprint, the beautiful trees that maintain our jungles and landscapes gorgeous will be saved instead of converted into newsprint; but the reality is that those arguments are false. In fact, much newsprint comes from trees grown for that specific purpose Bandow, Considering this factor, when people recycle paper they are not saving our beautiful landscapes, they are just saving trees that were planted for that specific purpose and also saving the money of the big companies that need to plant trees in order to produce paper to sell.


Another reason of why recycling should not be mandatory is because garbage is not harmful for people and recycling not always protects ecosystems. People should know one extremely important thing; folks recycle because they think it is a good thing to do, but what is the real point of being a green person? The truth is that garbage will not damage the society and recycling is not the miraculous method that will save the ecosystems in the earth. As time goes by through the past of the should recycling be mandatory essay, garbage accumulates, but also disappears thanks to they new technologies created in order to have a solution for garbage problems.


The arguments that establish that our garbage will bury us and that it will also poison us are completely false, should recycling be mandatory essay. According to Daniel K. Benjaminsince the s, should recycling be mandatory essay, people repeatedly have claimed that the United States faces a landfill crisis. The United States today has more landfill capacity than ever before. Inthe nation's landfills could accommodate 18 years' worth of rubbish, an amount 25 percent greater should recycling be mandatory essay a decade before, should recycling be mandatory essay. Nowadays is pretty clear that we are not going to be full of garbage in the future.


The myths that stated that in a few years there would be no more landfill spaces for garbage in the United States were completely false, but the good new is that nowadays the mentioned misconception is completely denied. In addition, there were many people who argued that the garbage sent to landfills could produce deaths in the country. They think that the toxic substances produces by the garbage could reach cities and cause dangerous diseases to people. Again the good new is that they were wrong. According to Benjaminthe Environmental Protection Agency itself acknowledges that the risks to humans from modern landfills are virtually nonexistent: Modern landfills can be expected to cause 5.


To put this in perspective, cancer kills overpeople every year in the United States. In a few words, there is technically no risk for humans to die because of the accumulation of toxic substances produced by the trash that is in landfills. In addition, it is interesting to know how garbage and not going green should recycling be mandatory essay deal with different kind of subjects that apparently people did not have idea about before, should recycling be mandatory essay. Recycling is a process that in a good point of views cuts pollution but that is not always. Recycling can reduce pollution but when is time to recycle things it produces almost the same pollution it prevented should recycling be mandatory essay. So what is it the point of recycle?


The EPA has examined both virgin paper processing and recycled paper processing for toxic substances and found that toxins often are more prevalent in the recycling processes Benjamin, should recycling be mandatory essay, People should know that should recycling be mandatory essay occasions recycling produces more pollution than the ones that it is supposed to save. If people think that recycling is supposed to save the environment, how can it cause more pollution than the normal garbage process? The answer again is misconceptions, should recycling be mandatory essay. Finally, recycling needs more money than people think. When we hear recycling, one of the first words that come to our mind right away is save; save money, save resources, save the world.


All this since there is too many people who assume that recycling is a right thing to do. Experts have been doing research about recycling and its expenses, is it really worth to invest those big amounts of money in just going green? We all would like to have a yes answer to that question; unfortunately we obtain a different answer, an opposing one. The reality is that collecting recyclable items is more expensive than collecting just garbage to landfills. All of this because when people want to recycle they have to separate all stuff depending on how is it classified.


It takes a lot of time to classify, should recycling be mandatory essay, but also transport to go back and forward for each thing. Instead if people collect all the garbage at once, should recycling be mandatory essay, they would save time and money, but also carbon dioxide would be less produced by the trucks used to pick up the garbage. It is unbelievable the amount of money that is invested on recycling. All green products are more expensive than products that are not recycled, should recycling be mandatory essay, and that is because it costs too much to recycle. Another important fact is that recycling programs usually operate in a deficit.


This is a great problem. How does recycling is supposed to be mandatory if recycling programs usually operate in a deficit? It is very difficult for local government to maintain these recycling programs because sometimes the local budget is limited and waste money in a program that operates in a deficit is a very bad idea. The government of that city has already the experience needed to know the truth about recycling programs and the only cause that they produce: waste of money. Recycling seems to be useful just for people who still believe all the myths about it and have not yet discovered the truth about this method. Nowadays, recycling should not be mandatory because it is very expensive, and in the big majority of the occasions the recycling programs operate in a deficit that produces financial problems in local governments.


In addition, the myth about landfill spaces is completely false because nowadays there are a lot of landfills with great technology should recycling be mandatory essay eliminates the risk of poison people because of the garbage. Finally, it is proved that recycling does not always save resources and in some cases, it wastes more energy or water than the normal garbage process. The question now is: how can such a wasteful practice persist? Environmentalists may enuinely believe they're helping the Earth, but they have been hurting the common good while profiting personally".


Tierney provide a great should recycling be mandatory essay for such a controversial question. The politicians who feel pressure by environmentalists are the ones who still support recycling in order to maintain their good political status. On the other hand, environmentalist may think that they are really helping the health of the world, but something that is really truth is that they are being directly beneficiated because of the continuity of recycling. Do they really want to go green or do they prefer to go for the green material named dollars? The real intention of environmentalists is something that only they know.


People may feel confortable with recycling because they could think that they are helping; and if they feel good about themselves they are free to continue with this wasteful practice, but the government should reveal the truth about recycling in order to clarify the misconceptions about this topic. If after that people still want to recycle they are still free to do so. After people know the real pros and cons about recycling it would be very easy for the majority to know if recycling should be mandatory or not. on Should Recycling Be Mandatory?




Why recycling should be mandatory

, time: 5:06





Recycling Should Be Mandatory Essay Example For FREE �� - New York Essays


should recycling be mandatory essay

Recycling should be mandatory because it will save energy, reduce landfills, and protect the environment. Many people today still don’t realise what recycling really does. According to the dictionary, “Recycling converts show more content. It prolongs the earth, and may not protect in the way you might think Recycling Should Be Mandatory For All Cities Essay Words | 6 Pages. it is changing and harming many environments. Wherever someone travels to, the individual may see trash cluttering neighborhoods, cities, and even reservoirs. Recycling should be mandatory for all cities so that many forms of life can live in a healthy environment Beyond the scope of the activities accomplished by the devoted environmentalists, recycling should be mandatory to every household in the civilized and eco-friendly society. Recycling lessens the need for landfills The sustainability of recycling serves as the best response to the rapidly increasing consumerism trends and subsequent amounts of waste

No comments:

Post a Comment